- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 13316/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13316 of 2023 Applicant :- Md. Habib @ Habib Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Anil Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Amitabh Chaturvedi, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records.
¶2The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 7 of 2017, under Sections 3/ 5/ 8 of U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955, Police Station Patranga, District Ayodhya/Faizabad.
¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 08.01.2017 against 15 persons, including the applicant, alleging that on the basis of the information received from a mukhbir, a police party reached Village Wajidpur and upon seeing the police, the accused persons ran away. About two quintal flesh of cow progeny was recovered from the house of co-accused person Harun, Sakeel and Sageer.
¶4The co-accused persons have been implicated on the basis of information given by some persons present on the spot, who declined to witness the recovery or mention their name.
¶5A supplementary affidavit has been filed disclosing the applicant's involvement in five other cases.
¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant was not arrested on the spot; the persons who disclosed his name have not disclosed their identity and have not witnessed the alleged recovery; that the applicant is languishing in jail since
30.07.2023 and without making any observations which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.
¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
¶9Let the applicant-Md. Habib @ Habib be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.