- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 8 November 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- 10583/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10583 of 2023 Applicant :- Ayub Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaikaran Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Aniruddh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the material placed on record. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash/set aside the impugned charge sheet no.59 of 2019 dated 25.10.2020 and cognizance order dated 23.7.2022 passed by Special Judge (POCSO Act), Pratapgarh in Special Sessions Trial No.683 of 2022 (State of U.P. Vs. Ayub) arising out of Case Crime No.09 of 2019 under Sections 323, 504, 506, 354 I.P.C. and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station Jethwara, District Pratapgarh pending before Special Judge (POCSO Act), Pratapgarh. After argument at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the interest of justice would be served, if the bail application of the applicant is directed to be considered by the Court concerned. He further submits that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned and will file the bail application. He further added that this Court may be pleased to direct the Court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicant within stipulated period of time, as fixed by this Court. In view of the aforesaid submissions, present application is disposed off with a direction that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned and applies for bail, his bail application may be considered and decided in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible. Order Date :- 8.11.2023 Ram Murti High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.