VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ashish Kumar Shah v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
11127/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11127 of 2023 Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Shah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Civil Sectt. Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Tiwari,Ravi Patel,Vivek Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2Present application has been moved by the applicants for quashing the order dated 04.07.2023 passed by A.D.J.-VI, Lucknow in Criminal Appeal No.158/2017 under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that on the basis of incorrect facts, complaint was filed under Section 138 of N.I. Act and without proper appreciation, conviction order was passed on 23.05.2017 which was challenged before the Appellate Court as the appeal was admitted but applicant's counsel failed to appear before the trial court, as a result, non-bailable warrant was issued, and thereafter, application for recall was filed but the same was also dismissed for want of prosecution. He further submitted that due to fault of counsel, applicant may not be victimized. He further submitted that applicant is ready to cooperate in the proceeding pending before the Appellate Court and he is also ready to furnish personal bond as well as sureties, therefore, kind indulgence of this Court is necessary.

¶4Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer of applicant and submitted that as the applicant was not cooperating the proceedings as the appeal was being listed for final hearing, as a result, non-bailable warrant was issued, therefore, application is liable to be dismissed.

¶5Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application, as well as other relevant documents, as it is evident from the record that the appeal was admitted by the Appellate Court but due to fault of applicant's counsel, non-bailable warrant was issued, thereafter, application for recall was moved but the same was also dismissed for want of prosecution, as it is well settled by this Court as well as by Hon'ble Apex Court that due to fault of counsel, his client should not be victimized, therefore, the present application is disposed of and impugned order dated

04.07.2023 passed by A.D.J.-VI, Lucknow in Criminal Appeal No.158/2017 under Section 138 of N.I. Act is hereby set aside.

¶6Trial court is directed to decide the application for recall of the non-bailable warrant, sympathetically within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶7Till the disposal of aforesaid recall application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.