VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hiramani Mishra Thru.Proprietor Balaji Enterprises v. Central Govt. Thru. Prin. Secy Deptt. of Home Civil Sectt. New Delhi and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 9962/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9962 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hiramani Mishra Thru.Proprietor Balaji Enterprises Respondent :- Central Govt. Thru. Prin. Secy Deptt. Of Home Civil Sectt. New Delhi And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Sabir Farooqui Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. Present writ petition is filed by the petitioner with the following reliefs:- "i. issuing a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing to the opposite parties to make payment of due amount of Rs. 1,27,58,781/- for the construction work of C.R.P.F. (G.C.), Trisundi, District Amethi, in the interest of justice. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 & 3 to decide the representations of the petitioner, contained as Annexure No. 4, to this writ petition." Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be substantially met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Director General of Central Reserve Police Force at New Delhi, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.