Ram Chandra v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Secrt. Lucknow and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9946 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ram Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Civil Secrt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jyoti Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that there is a chak road, which is being closed by private respondents.

¶3Learned Standing Counsel, however, submits that the said raasta is not a chak road.

¶4Be that as it may, since the petitioner claims that it is a chak road, he has an alternative remedy of filing a an application under Section 26 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. It shall be open for the authority/court concerned to look into the merits of the case as to whether the said road is a chak road or any other road including the jurisdiction of the court.

¶5This Court has not gone into the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be decided by the authority/court concerned in accordance with law.

¶6Present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench