Suraj Kashyap @ Tantriks v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11129 of 2023 Applicant :- Suraj Kashyap @ Tantriks Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Nath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶2Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in criminal history of the applicant, total 7 criminal cases has been registered, details of which is as under:-

(i) Case Crime No. 547/2021, under Section 372, 411, 420 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Dehat, District Sultanpur;

(ii) Case Crime No.551/2021, under Section 419, 420 I.P.C., Police Station-Lambhua, District Sultanpur.

(iii) Case Crime No.59/2020, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 452, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Peeparpur, District Amethi.

(iv) Case Crime No.65/2022, under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

(v) Case Crime No.58/2022, under Section 417, 411, 420 I.P.C., Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

(vi) Case Crime No.117/2022, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities Act, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

(vii) Case Crime No.06/2022, under Section 406, 411, 417, 419, 420, Police Station-Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur.

¶3It has been submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that furnishing of two sureties in all 7 different cases is almost impracticable as the applicant is facing hardship and he will not be able to arrange the same to get bail.

¶4It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner/applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.

¶5Considering the aforesaid fact, the application (u/s 482 Cr.P.C.) is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.2,00,000/- each in one case which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail order has been passed. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench