VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Udaybhan v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
CMRA 136/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 136 of 2023 Applicant :- Udaybhan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- K.K. Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Copy of the instant petition is provided to the learned Standing Counsel today in Court. Present review petition is preferred under Chapter V Rule 12 of the Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 read with order 47 Rule 1 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking review of judgment and order dated 10.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ C No. 8725 of 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to typographical error order in the Writ Petition No. 8725 of 2023 has wrongly been transcribed, which needs rectification. Since the error is typographical one,thus, the order dated

10.10.2023 passed in Writ C No. 8725 of 2023 is hereby recalled and following order is being passed:-

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶2The petitioner approached this Court that his claim under the Mukhyamantri Kisan Evam Sarvhit Bima Yojana was allowed on 30.10.2019 directing the insurance company to pay the amount claimed by the petitioner, but till date amount has not been paid to the petitioner.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be substantially met if case of the petitioner is considered and amount is released by opposite party no. 3 - Oriental Insurance Company Limited through its Senior Regional Manager, Regional Office-2 Lucknow, if there is no legal impediment.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, the petitioner is permitted to make a representation to opposite party no. 3 - Senior Regional Manager, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office-2 Lucknow, along with relevant documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by the petitioner, opposite party no. 3 shall, unless there is any legal impediment and claim of the petitioner is allowed by the committee, make payment within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.