Hari Ram and 10 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Urban Planning U.P. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9970 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hari Ram And 10 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Chaturvedi Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned standing counsel for State. Petitioners have approached this Court for the following main relief: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties to provide compensation to the petitioners along with interest and solacium etc. as per Land Acquisition Act, with respect of petitioners' Gata No. 73Ga, 151Ga, 150Ga, 149Kha, 170Ga, 175Ga, 152, 74Ka, 145, 178, 173, 148K, 73Kha, 151Kha, 150Kha, 149K, 149Ga, 170Ka, 170Kha, 175Kha, 175Ka, 175Kha, 156Gha, 157Ga, 161Gha, 165Gha, 186Gha, 188Ga, 185, 179, 184, 146, 148Kha, 174, 152 situated at village and Post-Moiya Kapoorpur, Tehsil Sohawal, District Faizabad (now Ayodhya) was acquired by the opposite party no. 3 for renovation/beautification of Samada Lake and Bird Sanctuary." Learned counsel for petitioners submits that grievance of petitioners would sufÏciently be met in case representation of petitioners for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner. Learned standing counsel has no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioners are permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.4-District Magistrate, Ayodhya, raising all their grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of their claim within a period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioners, respondent no.4 shall consider and decide the same after hearing all the parties concerned in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench