- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10009/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10009 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dashrath Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Civil Sectt. Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Maneesh Singh,Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Admittedly, there is suit under Section 116 for partition is pending between the petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 to 11 before the Court of Sub-Divisional Magistrate and petitioner claims that during pendency of the said suit, the private respondents are raising construction on spot. In the given circumstances, the petitioner has remedy of filing a stay application in the said suit itself. In case the such application is filed, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate concerned shall decide the same expeditiously after hearing all the parties concerned. With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 9.11.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.