Rukhsar Bano v. State of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. and 3 Others

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 714 of 2023 Applicant :- Rukhsar Bano Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Satyendra Nath Mishra,Vartika Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA and perused the record.

¶2The present application has been filed by the applicant to direct learned C.J.M., Room No.16, Sultanpur to decide the Criminal Case No.8031 of 2022 in F.I.R. No.429 of 2022 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District-Sultanpur pending before him, expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the charge sheet was filed on 28.05.2022 and till today only P.W.1 has been examined, therefore, a direction may be issued to decide the aforesaid case, expeditiously.

¶4Learned AGA has opposed the prayer of applicant and submitted that trial of case in question is going on and no direction to expedite the trial of the case in question is required.

¶5Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, going through the contents of application as well as other relevant documents, as it is evident that P.W.1 has been examined and the cross-examination of witnesses is going on, therefore, I am of the view that no direction to expedite the trial proceedings is needed at this state.

¶6Accordingly, the application is hereby dismissed. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 V. Sinha High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench