- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10042/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10042 of 2023 Petitioner :- Shiv Sevak Singh Respondent :- District Magistrate Raibareli And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gopesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
¶2After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case he is permitted to move appropriate application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and the same may be decided expeditiously.
¶3In case petitioner moves such an application for demarcation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2/S.D.M. Maharajganj, Raibareli, the respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, after hearing all the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, say within a period of six weeks from the date the application under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code along with a certified copy of this order is filed. It shall be open to the petitioner, if he so desires to file the stay application, which shall also be decided along with the aforesaid application.
¶4With the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.