- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Case no.
- 11202/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11202 of 2023 Applicant :- Gaya Prasad Gautam Alias Gaya Prasad And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Mohan Upadhyay,Shiv Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
¶1Heard Sri Shyam Mohan Upadhyay, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Nirmal Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
¶2The instant application has been filed with a prayer to quash the entire Complaint No. 06 of 2022 Police Station - Isanagar, District - Kheri as well as the impugned summoning order dated
14.03.2023 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO)/ Upper Session Judge Court No.11, Lakhimpur -Kheri and further prayed to stay the impugned summoning order dated -
14.03.2023, passed by the Special Judge (POCSO)/ Upper Session Judge Court No.11, Lakhimpur - Kheri in Complaint No. 06 of 2022.
¶3After argument at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the interest of justice would be served, if the bail application of the applicants are directed to be considered by the Court concerned. He further submits that the applicants shall surrender before the Court concerned and will file the bail application. He further added that this Court may be pleased to direct the Court concerned to decide the bail application of the applicants within stipulated period of time, as fixed by this Court.
¶4In view of the aforesaid submissions, present application is disposed off with a direction that in case, the applicants surrender before the Court concerned and applies for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously as possible. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Mayank High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.