VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aazad Bahadur Singh @ Guddu Singh v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
9 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
13505/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13505 of 2023 Applicant :- Aazad Bahadur Singh @ Guddu Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Nagendra Singh,Prashant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Nagendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anant Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Pranav Pandey, Advocate who has put in appearance on behalf of the informant and filed his vakalatnama, which is taken on record.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.501 of 2014, under Sections 147, 308, 323, 325, 504 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 16.08.2014 against six persons, including the applicant, alleging that because of a petty dispute, accused persons had attacked the informant and his family members.

¶4An F.I.R. No.289 of 2014 was lodged from the side of the applicant on the same day at 15.40 hrs. against three persons including the informant of the present case alleging assault by six persons. Persons from both the sides have received injuries in the incident.

¶5In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that persons from both the sides have received injuries in the incident; that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant and two co-accused persons have already been granted bail, and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Aazad Bahadur Singh @ Guddu Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 prateek High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.