- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10044/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10044 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Sunita Devi And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenbue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukesh Kumar Maurya,Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
¶2This petition has been filed by petitioner for the following main prayer:- "I. A writ. order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 to take appropriate decision on the representation dated 30.07.2022 as well as dated
28.2.2023 moved by the petitioners which is annexed as Annexure No.8 and 9 to this writ petition, and opposite parties may be directed to grant benefit to the petitioners under the scheme of Mukhyamantri Krishak, Durghatana Kalyan Yojana."
¶3Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the prayer made.
¶4Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.2-District Magistrate, District - Hardoi to take a decision on the application/claim of the petitioner in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment, within a period of three months from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon him.
¶5With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.