- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10071/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10071 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Maa Siddheshwari Construction Thru. Proprietor Bhaiya Lalyadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. S Ecy. Deptt. Nagar Vikas Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Shravan Kumar Verma,Basant Lal Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri K.K. Pandey, who has filed his Power today on behalf of respondent no.2, which is taken on record.
¶2A similar matter has already been disposed of vide judgment dated 19.11.2015 in W.P. No. 10743(MB) of 2015, M/s Shatkashi Construction Company v. State of U.P. and others, which is not disputed by the learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam.
¶3Accordingly, this matter is also covered by the decision in the case of Tajveer Singh v. State of U.P. and others [1997 ALJ 285]. The petitioner shall also be entitled to the same benefits.
¶4The writ petition is disposed of with the said directions. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.