- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10097/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10097 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Aarav Construction Thru. Proprietor Manoj Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Institutional Finance Govt. Of U.P. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Aishwarya Jaiswal, Advocate, who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, which is taken on record. There is a full agreement at the bar that the matter stands squarely covered by the judgement of this Court delivered in the case of Tajveer Singh and others vs. State of U.P. and others, 1997 (2) AWC 1029. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances as brought on record, the opposite parties are directed to give effect to the judgment of this Court in the case of Tajveer Singh and others (supra). It is further provided that the petitioner will not be required to pay stamp duty except in accordance with Article 57 of the Schedule 1-B. This order will apply only in respect of the security amount/security bond. The petition is disposed of accordingly. (Manish Kumar,J) (Vivek Chaudhary,J) Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Ashish High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.