Kallu v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. and 5 Others

Court No. - 17 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1057 of 2023 Petitioner :- Kallu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Maurya,Siddharth Raj Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sampurna Nand Shukla Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for 1 to 4.

¶2By means of present writ petition the petitioner has sought direction to the State respondents to remove illegal encorachment of private respondents on public land being Gata No. 499-Kha, area 0.051 hectares situated at Village - Sheetalmau, Pargana - Rampur, Tehsil - Lalganj Ajhara, District - Pratapgarh.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that private respondent no. 6 has illegally encroached upon the public land being Gata No. 996, area 0.2930 hectares and Gata No. 499-Kha, area 0.051 hectares situated at Village - Sheetalmau, Pargana - Rampur, Tehsil - Lalganj Ajhara, District - Pratapgarh, which plot is registered as "Pond" in the revenue records. In this regard the petitioner has moved applications before the competent authority but till date no action has been taken for removal of illegal encroachment by private respondent from the aforesaid public land.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that petitioner has remedy under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, of moving an application before the competent authority with regard to removal of illegal encroachment over the public land and under the said Act, 2006, the competent authority is empowered to take action against illegal encroachers and imposition of penalty is also provided.

¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner at this stage submits that petitioner may be granted liberty to move appropriate application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code and has prayed for suitable direction to the competent authority to consider and take steps for removal of illegal encroachment by the illegal encroacher from the aforesaid public land.

¶6Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the above limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 with regard to removal of illegal encroachment by the private respondent over the public land, before the competent authority within two weeks from today. In case any such application is made, the competent authority shall proceed to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench