- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10021/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10021 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Bajpai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector Hardoi And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh K. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Sri Rakesh K. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent, and learned Standing Counsel. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that Respondent Nos.7, 8 and 9 are interfering in peaceful possession of the petitioner. He also submits that the consolidation proceedings are going on with regard to the property in dispute. In view thereof, the petitioner can move appropriate application in the consolidation proceedings, which shall be considered and decided expeditiously by passing reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law. with the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 9.11.2023 S. Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.