- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 9 November 2023
- Bench
- Subhash Vidyarthi
- Case no.
- 13408/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13408 of 2023 Applicant :- Sharad Kumar Verma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
¶1Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shaunak Singh, learned A.G.A.-I for the State and perused the records.
¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.269 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Rampur Kalan, District Sitapur.
¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 14.10.2022 against ten persons, including the applicant, alleging that the informant and his family members had made investments in STS/Sankalp Group under allurement of lucrative return but upon maturity the money was not refunded to the investors.
¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case on the basis of wrong averments made in the FIR. The informant had not made any investment in STS/Sankalp Group rather he had made investment in LLC Multistate Agro Co-operative Society Ltd., under various schemes under which they had to be given plots of land upon completion of investments for various periods. The investors did not deposit the complete amount by paying all the installments rather they filed the FIR.
¶5The applicant's criminal history of 43 cases has been disclosed in para 17 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, in three of which the applicant has already been granted bail.
¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.
¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is also entitled to be release on bail in the aforesaid crime.
¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.
¶9Let the applicant-Sharad Kumar Verma be released on bail in the aforesaid case, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;
(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;
(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 Preeti. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.