Malti Devi and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. U.P. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8809 of 2023 Petitioner :- Malti Devi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrt. U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishnu Pandey,Akash Kumar Yadav,Swati Singh Rajawat Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

¶1Shri Kunwar Ravi Prakash, Advocate has filed his power on behalf of the private respondent.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A and Shri Kunwar Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.

¶3This petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(a.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing of the impugned first information report lodged by the opposite party no.4 has lodged false and fabricated FIR No.0614 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station PGI, District - Lucknow Uttar Pradesh dated 29.09.23 against the petitioners contained as Annexure No.1 to this writ petition so far as it relates to the petitioners. (b.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus be issued commanding the opposite parties not to arrest the Petitioners in pursuance of the impugned FIR lodged by the opposite party no.4 on

29.09.23 bearing No.0614 of 2023, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station PGI, District - Lucknow Uttar Pradesh.

¶4Shri Kunwar Ravi Prakash, learned counsel for the respondent no.4 has pointed out that the petitioners have already approached the District Judge for anticipatory bail.

¶5The counsel for the petitioner at this stage says that he does not wish to press the writ petition.

¶6In view of the statement of the counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.. Order Date :- 9.11.2023 KR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench