VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Nanki @ Susheela Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
11152/2022

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11152 of 2022 Applicant :- Nanki @ Susheela Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Kumar Verma,Adarsh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Anand Pratap Singh,Ram Singh Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Upendra Kumar Verma, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, the learned A.G.A for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 156 of 2022, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 06.03.2022 against five persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had entered into a registered agreement to purchase a property from the applicant on 20.04.2018 and the applicant had executed a sale deed in furtherance of the aforesaid agreement on 30.11.2021. However, in the intervening period, the applicant executed a registered agreement to sell the same property to another person on 26.02.2020. The FIR itself states that upon being asked, the applicant had stated that the entire thing was done by her son.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is 62 year's old innocent woman having no criminal history.

¶5The learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement at Bar that the applicant is languishing in jail since 05.05.2022 and even charges have not been framed till date.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Nanki @ Susheela Devi be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.