Shiv Shanker Verma v. Sri Senthil Pandiyan C., Excise Commissioner, U.P., Prayagraj, Camp Office, Lko

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3444 of 2023 Applicant :- Shiv Shanker Verma Opposite Party :- Sri Senthil Pandiyan C., Excise Commissioner, U.P., Prayagraj, Camp Office, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Balram Yadav,Satendra Jaiswal Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Birendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Sunil Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.

¶2Sri Bajpai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has produced the copy of instructions letter dated 08.11.2023 preferred by the Commissioner, Excise, U.P. addressing to the Chief Standing Counsel enclosing therewith the relevant documents/ letters/ orders being issued by the Excise Commissioner including the copy of order dated 07.11.2023 whereby the final decision has been taken in terms of order of the Writ Court. The aforesaid instructions letter dated 08.11.2023 along with its enclosures are taken on record and photocopy thereof has been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶3Sri Birendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that this is not a compliance in the little sense but the decision has been taken by the Excise Commissioner, U.P., therefore, the petitioner may be given liberty to challenge the aforesaid order before appropriate court of law.

¶4In the wake of aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition.

¶5Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶6Notice, if any, stands discharged.

¶7It is always open for the petitioner to challenge the order dated

07.11.2023 passed by the Excise Commissioner, U.P. before appropriate court of law, if the petitioner feels himself aggrieved from that order. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 16.11.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench