- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- Alok Mathur
- Case no.
- 10122/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 17 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10122 of 2023 Petitioner :- Jay Hanuman Mahila Swayam Sahayta Samooh,Ayodhya Thru. Chairman Sushama Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Supplies Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Durgesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Ram Kinkar Upadhyay Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
¶1Heard Sri Durgesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 6, Sri Mohan Singh for respondent No.7 and Sri Ajay Pratap Singh for respondent No.8.
¶2The vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondent No.8 is taken on record.
¶3By means of the present writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 10th October, 2023 passed by Sub Divisional,l Magistrate, Tehsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya whereby the representation of the petitioner has been rejected.
¶4Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.8 submits that subsequent to rejection of the representation of the petitioner allotment of the fair price shop license in question has been made in favour of respondent No.8 and submits that in case the petitioner is aggrieved of the said allotment he has alternate remedy of filing appeal.
¶5Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that considering the subsequent development which has taken place where the allotment of license of the fair price shop in question has been made in favour of respondent No.8, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach competent authority for challenging the said order of allotment dated
21.10.2023 before competent authority.
¶6In light of the above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 17.11.2023 RKM. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.