- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Om Prakash Shukla
- Case no.
- WRIC 10128/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10128 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sadashiv Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Civil Secrt. Lko And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Bhan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the Gaon Sabha. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that private respondents are interfering in his possession. Respondent nos. 5 to 10 are private respondents in the present petition. Since the matter in the present petition relates to the dispute between the private parties, it cannot be adjudicated by this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India. The writ petition is consigned to record with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/Court in accordance with law. (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.