VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Yadav and Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
17 November 2023
Bench
Rajeev Singhauthor
Case no.
8892/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8892 of 2023 Applicant :- Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Yadav And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. and perused the material available on record.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the order dated 11.11.2022 passed by learned Additional Session Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act, Faizabad in Criminal Revision No.166/2021 "Manbasiya & Ors. Vs. Smt. Pooja Yadav & Anr." as well as order dated 7.9.2021 passed by learned Civil Judge (J.D.) F.T.C., Faizabad in Complaint Case No.290/2020 "Pooja Yadav Vs. Vijay Yadav & Ors".

¶3Learned counsel for applicants submits that the applicants are innocent persons and falsely implicated in the present case. In view of above, this application deserves to be allowed.

¶4Per contra, learned A.G.A. urged that there is sufÏcient evidence against the applicant and there is no occasion for quashing of the impugned summoning order and proceedings of aforesaid case.

¶5Having heard learned counsel for the parties, a perusal of record and in the facts and circumstances of the case, a prima facie, case is made out against the applicant. Therefore, prayer for quashing the impugned summoning order as well as proceedings of aforesaid case, is declined.

¶6After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that he may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.

¶7Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.

¶8In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge applications through counsel within four weeks' from today and, in case, any such application is being filed, the same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.

¶9Till the aforesaid period of four weeks' and during the pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case.

¶10In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.

¶11It is clarified that after disposal of discharge application, the applicant will be subject to regular process of the court concerned, including bail etc.

¶12With the above directions, this application is disposed of. Order Date :- 17.11.2023 Gaurav/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.