Sushil Kumar v. Lko. Development Authority Thru. Its Secy. Lko. and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10142 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sushil Kumar Respondent :- Lko. Development Authority Thru. Its Secy. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Varun Kant Counsel for Respondent :- Ratnesh Chandra,Ishan Singh Popli Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Ms. Shivani, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for the Lucknow Development Authority.

¶2Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that his mother was allotted a plot in the year 1984 of 1800 square feet and thereafter the same was changed in the name of father of petitioner on 29.8.1984 and he also deposited the entire amount on 30.8.1984, however, thereafter when father of petitioner approached the Lucknow Development Authority for execution of sale deed, the same was not executed on the ground that there was some litigation going on with regard to the plot in question. The petitioner had tried his best to get the dispute resolved and had approached the Lokayukta, but till date, the said dispute has not been resolved and the sale deed has not been executed in favour of petitioner.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of petitioner would be sufficiently met in case representation of petitioner for the said purposes is considered and decided in a time bound manner.

¶4Learned counsel for respondents has no objection to the same.

¶5In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Vice Chairman, Lucknow Development Authority, Pradhikaran Bhawan, Vipin Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents/judgments in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order.

¶6In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date, a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him.

¶7It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law.

¶8With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 18.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench