- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 18 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10161/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10161 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohd. Aslam Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy U.P. Govt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kirti Kar Tripathi,Shrikant Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amit Kumar Dwivedi,Aprajita Bansal Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Karan Agarwal, holding brief of Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel for the Power Corporation. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the provisional assessment order dated 26.10.2023 passed by the respondent no. 5/Executive Engineer, Vidyut Nagariya Vitran Khand, Lucknow. Learned counsel for the Power Corporation states that the petitioner has a remedy of filing his objection against the said assessment order. In the given circumstances, in case petitioner files his objection against the said assessment order dated
26.10.2023 within a period of fifteen days from today before the respondent no. 5 i.e. the Executive Engineer, Vidyut Nagariya Vitran Khand, Lucknow, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no. 5 by passing a reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of fifteen days of submission of the said objection. Any action against the petitioner thereafter shall be subject to the final order passed by respondent no. 5. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 18.11.2023 Nitesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.