Juned Ahmad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. and 2 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8949 of 2023 Petitioner :- Juned Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Azam Khan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

1.At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to implead District Basic Education Officer, Barabanki, as respondent no.4 during course of the day.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2, Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.3, and Sri Prashant Singh holding brief of Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.4.

¶3With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is finally disposed off.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels for respondents have no objection.

¶5In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.3 then respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order.

¶6With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off.

¶7It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 18.11.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench