Raj Kumar Saroj and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13656 of 2023 Applicant :- Raj Kumar Saroj And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar,Ashok Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Avinash Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants, Ms. Ankita Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicants on bail in Case Crime No. 45 of 2022, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 307, 34 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 28.02.2022 against 27 persons, including the applicants, stating that the accused persons had abused the informant and beaten up some other persons. The F.I.R. states that the co-accused Amir Chand has assaulted with an axe and co-accused Rajkumar, the applicant no. 1, Mithilesh and Hariom and other persons had assaulted with sticks.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the present case. Involvement of applicant no. 1 in four other cases has been disclosed by filing supplementary affidavit, two of which related to U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 and the same have been closed upon expiry of the stipulated period. In two other cases the applicant no. 1 has been granted bail. The applicant no. 2 has no criminal history.

¶5Three of the co-accused persons, Rama Shankar Yadav and Mukesh Saroj and Hari Om Saroj have been granted bail by means of the orders dated 27.09.2023, 30.10.2023 &

18.11.2023 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 3087 of 2022, 12729 of 2023 & 13610 of 2023 respectively.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the F.I.R contains general allegations against the applicants; that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by this court; that the applicants are languishing in jail since

12.05.2023 and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicants-(i) Raj Kumar Saroj & (ii) Abhishek Saroj be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Pradeep/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench