VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shiv Kumar Goswami v. State of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat Lucknow

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
20 November 2023
Bench
Subhash Vidyarthiauthor
Case no.
5609/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5609 of 2023 Applicant :- Shiv Kumar Goswami Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Its Principal Secretary Home, Civil Secretariat Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.

¶1Heard Sri Vivek Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shaunak Singh, the learned AGA-I for the State and perused the records.

¶2The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 128 of 2022, under Sections 409, 420 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow.

¶3The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on

05.02.2022 against ten persons, including the applicant, in furtherance of an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. stating that the informant had made some investment in Ani Bullion Group but upon maturity, the amount invested was not repaid to her.

¶4In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, in para 8 it has been stated that the applicant' father was Director in the aforesaid company and the applicant was neither a Director nor any other principal position holder of the company.

¶5Applicant's criminal history of 33 cases has been disclosed in para 13 of the affidavit, all of which relate to transactions of the aforesaid society. In 31 cases, the applicant has already been granted bail.

¶6The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶7Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping fact that the grievance of the informant is regarding non refund of money invested in a company and the applicant's father was Director of the company and he is not a director thereof and that the applicant has already been granted bail in several other cases of similar nature, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case also.

¶8Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Shivkumar Goswami be released on bail in the aforesaid case, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

(i) the applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

(ii) the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

(iii) the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Preeti. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.