Ramjeevan v. The State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko

Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11269 of 2023 Applicant :- Ramjeevan Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Sandeep Kumar Pal,Desh Deepak Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.

¶1Learned counsel for the applicant after arguing at quite some length submits that he does not want to press the instant bail application and the same may be dismissed as not pressed.

¶2In this regard learned AGA for the State would have no objection.

¶3Having regard to the statement given by learned counsel for the applicant, the instant bail application is dismissed as not pressed at this stage.

¶4However, the applicant may renew his prayer for bail when the witnesses of the facts are examined. If the witnesses of the facts are not examined within the next seven months, the applicant in that scenario would also be in a position to approach this Court for the purpose to renew his prayer for bail. Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Muk High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench