VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi v. Commissioner of Income Tax Income Tax Office Lucknow and

Allowed/Partly Allowed on merits/Granted
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
20 November 2023
Bench
Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
Case no.
WRIC 157/2001

Judgment

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 157 of 2001 Petitioner :- Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi Respondent :- Commissioner Of Income Tax Income Tax Office Lucknow And Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Chandra,Anand Prakash Sinha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pradeep Agrawal,S.C. Mishra Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has approached this Court challenging the notice dated 18.12.2000 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the said show cause notice itself shows that the same was not containing anything. Today, written instructions dated 18.11.2023 received by learned counsel for respondents Sri Kushagra Dixit from the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Lucknow are placed before this this Court which state that Office has searched the master data of records available with them and no case records pertaining to Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi could be traced. It further states that likelihood of records being with the ADG (Vig) (Hq) North O/o the DGIT (Vigilance) is more probable. The relevant Paragraphs 6 & 7 of the letter dated

18.11.2023, are read as under:- "6. In response the O/o the Additional Director General (Vigilance, New Delhi vide his email has intimated that the case record are 24 years old. Such case records are not maintained by his office and that searching master data of records of his office no case records pertaining to Shri Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi could be traced. It was also communicated that the likelihood of records being with the ADG (Vig) (Hq) North O/o the DGIT (Vigilance is more probable. (copy enclosed as Annexure-3).

¶7In view of above it is submitted that even after all out efforts made the case records in the case of Shri Prabhat Chandra Chaturvedi (PAN: AAIP C3940M) for AY.1993-94 and 1994-95 could not be traced out." In view thereof, since the record is not available, this Court is unable to find the reasons for which the notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, was issued to the petitioner and thus the same cannot stand. The notice dated 18.12.2000 issued to the petitioner under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, is quashed. The writ petition is allowed. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 20.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.