- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 21 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10151/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10151 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anmol Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Sectt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashank Shukla,Prachi Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Chandra Kashish Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Sri Brijesh Shukla, learned counsel for respondent no.5. Petitioner has approached this Court claiming that certain recovery proceedings are initiated against his brother in which part of the property of petitioner, which he never gifted to his brother, is also being auctioned. The petitioner has an efÏcacious alternative remedy of filing his objections before the authority concerned which is proceeding for recovery, in accordance with law. In case any such objections are filed by the petitioner, the concerned authority is expected to decide objections of the petitioner expeditiously, in accordance with law. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is consigned to records. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 21.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.