VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramdhani Yadav @ Ram Dhani v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
22 November 2023
Bench
Manish Mathurauthor
Case no.
9013/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 20 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9013 of 2023 Petitioner :- Ramdhani Yadav @ Ram Dhani Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shesh Ram Mishra,Ajai Kumar,Shobhit Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties.

¶2Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties for payment of difference of leave encashment admissible to petitioner on account of second promotional pay-scale as calculated by opposite party no.4 vide letter dated 04.09.2019. Further prayer for interest on the arrears of difference of leave encashment has also been sought.

¶3It has been submitted that petitioner superannuated from service on 31.12.2009 but leave encashment was not paid to him due to which he made a representation and the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar District Raebareli vide letter dated

04.09.2019 admitted petitioner's due, which have however not been paid till date.

¶4For the aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation but seeks liberty to file a fresh representation before concerned authority. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.

¶5Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case petitioner is granted liberty to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Raebareli. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.

¶6In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid benefit, actual payment shall be ensured within a period of six weeks thereafter.

¶7With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Subodh/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.