- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Bench
- Jyotsna Sharma
- Case no.
- 14534/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 28 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14534 of 2021 Applicant :- Hari Om Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Home Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. with Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5268 of 2021 Applicant :- Hariom Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sharad Pathak,Piyush Pathak,Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Abhinav Pankaj,Ajeet Kumar Mishra,Alok Kumar Mishra,Angrej Nath Shukla,Arjun Kumar Kaushal,Avneet Singh,Krishana Kumar Singh,Qazi Mohd.Ahmad,Smt. Shikha Srivastava Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
¶1This bail application is connected with Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5268 of 2021.
¶2Case called out. None responds for the applicant. Sri Mandhata Samrat, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Abhinav Pankaj, Sri Ajeet Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party/the investors/first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
¶3Perusal of the papers show that the accused applicant was released on interim bail in both the cases by order dated 14.12.2021. And the applicant was allowed to remain on interim bail.
¶4The learned A.G.A. for the State submits that in the presence of learned counsel for the first informant and on the willingness shown by both the sides, this matter was remitted to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of the Court subject to certain conditions. The investors, who were the affected party, were permitted to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre by the order dated 28.11.2022, however, the conditions were not fulfilled. The applicant neither deposited the money nor appeared before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre.
¶5It is further brought to the notice of the court that by order dated 11.04.2023 passed by this Court, interim bail granted to the applicant was cancelled and he was directed to surrender before the court concerned within 15 days from the date of the order.
¶6The learned A.G.A. submits that the applicant did not surrender before the court concerned.
¶7As none responds for the applicant today, hence, this bail application is dismissed.
¶8Let a copy of the order be immediately sent to the court concerned.
¶9Copy of the order be kept on Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5268 of 2021. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Sumit Kumar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.