Sunil Kumar v. State of U.P the Prin. Secy. Revenue Govt. U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9663 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P The Prin. Secy. Revenue Govt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishwa Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ram Kumar Singh Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for petitioner states that petitioner has already moved a representation regarding allotment of land as a poor scheduled caste Bhumiheen Mazdoor on which the petitioner is conducting agricultural activities and also put his boring. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the same. In view thereof, petitioner is permitted to make a fresh detailed representation to respondent no.2-Sub

Divisional

Magistrate,

Pargana/Tehsil Bangarmau, Sandila Road, Unnao, raising all his grievance, annexing therewith a copy of this writ petition along with annexures and all the documents in support of his claim within a period of two weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. In case such a representation is moved by petitioner, respondent no.2, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order along with representation is placed before him. It is made clear that this court has not applied itself on the merits of the case and all questions are left open to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law. With the aforesaid directions, present writ petition is disposed of. . (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench