- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 22 November 2023
- Bench
- Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
- Case no.
- 8374/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8374 of 2023 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anupam Rastogi,Archana Verma,Dr. Ashish Asthana Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.
¶1Sri Anurag Tripathi, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite party no. 5, which is taken on record.
¶2Sri Krishna Kant Singh, Investigating Officer is present in person, he has given revised instructions to the learned A.G.A., who has filed a short counter affidavit, which is taken on record.
¶3In paragraph-08 of the same, it has been mentioned that money was withdrawn by the informant from his Bank and then paid in cash to the petitioner. A total amount of Rs.15,50,000/- in cash has been paid, for which documentary evidence can be traced. With regard to the remaining amount, the informant has not furnished any evidence.
¶4This Court finds from a perusal of the short counter affidavit that atleast Rs. 15,50,000/- were paid by the informant to the petitioner on his making out that he will be allotted crypto currency for the money he pays in cash. The petitioner is also admitted this face in whats app chat, copy of which has been provided by the informant which is a part of the case diary.
¶5This Court finds no good ground to show interference in the impugned F.I.R.
¶6Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 22.11.2023 Darpan Sharma High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.