- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Bench
- Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
- Case no.
- 8971/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8971 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohammad Iqbal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lokendra Kumar Gupta,Mirza Humayun Qadar,Pankaj Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. This petition has been filed with the prayer for a direction to be issued in the nature of Certiorari quashing thereby the impugned First Information Report dated 07.11.2023 registered at Case Crime No.1192 of 2023, under Sections 420, 323, 376, 384, 506 and 120-B of the I.P.C., Police Sation Kotwali, District Barabanki. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are completely innocent and the respondent no.4 is the wife of petitioner no.1 and there is a matrimonial dispute between the parties. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for quashing of the First Information Report and submitted that cognizable offence is made out against the petitioners in the impugned F.I.R., therefore, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed. After having examined the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned F.I.R., we are of the opinion that the impugned F.I.R. discloses cognizable offence by the petitioners, hence, no interference is called for by this Court in its extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the F.I.R. or for grant of any interim relief to the petitioners and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Rahul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.