Manish Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13862 of 2023 Applicant :- Manish Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Salman,Mukhtar Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.

¶1Learned A.G.A. informs that he has procured complete instruction in the matter including up-to-date case diary.

¶2Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3This bail application has been moved on behalf of the applicant-Manish Yadav for grant of bail, in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 263 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao, during pendency of trial.

¶4Learned counsel for accused-applicant while pressing the bail application submits that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case as well as in the single case mentioned in the gang chart. However, in the single case mentioned in the gang chart, the applicant has been released on bail by the Trial Court, vide order dated 06.06.2023 passed in Bail Application No. 1761 of 2023, a copy of which has been placed on record at Page No. 24 (Annexure No. 3) of this bail application and apart from the aforementioned single criminal case, there is no any other criminal case pending against the applicant.

¶5It is further submitted that applicant is in jail in this matter since 13.09.2023 and there is no apprehension that, if the facility of bail is granted to the applicant, he may flee from the course of law or will not appear before the court below, as also the evidence/material available on record is not strong enough to raise a presumption that the applicant is guilty of the offences mentioned in the gang chart.

¶6Learned A.G.A. opposes the prayer for bail, but could not confront the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶7Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, it is transpired from the record that applicant is involved in the single case mentioned in the gang chart. However, in the single case mentioned in the gang chart, applicant has been released on bail by the Trial Court. Apart from the above-mentioned case, applicant is not involved in any other case. Applicant is in jail in this matter since 13.09.2023 and the presence of the applicant may be secured before the Trial Court by placing adequate conditions.

¶8Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the considered view that applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is thus allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Manish Yadav involved in above-mentioned case, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

(ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

(iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶10In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶11Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the Court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

12.Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Praveen High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench