Suresh Yadav v. Sri Jaipal Singh, Executive Engineer, Unnao

Court No. - 4 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2634 of 2023 Applicant :- Suresh Yadav Opposite Party :- Sri Jaipal Singh, Executive Engineer, Unnao Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.

¶1Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel.

¶2Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel has produced a photocopy of letter dated 20.11.2023 issued by the Executive Engineer, Sharda Canal, Unnao Division, Unnao whereby the claim of the petitioner for payment of dues has been rejected. A copy thereof has been provided to Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is taken on record.

¶3Sri Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel has stated that the order of the Writ Court has been complied with in its letter and spirit, therefore, this contempt petition may be dismissed.

¶4Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶5In the wake of the aforesaid development, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant contempt petition.

¶6Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed.

¶7Notices, if any, stand discharged.

¶8However, it is always open for the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order before the appropriate court of law/ authority if the petitioner feels himself aggrieved from that order. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Suresh/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench