Dropati v. U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director and 3 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9047 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dropati Respondent :- U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban) Thru. Managing Director And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra,Harish Chandra,Neeraj Tewari,Tauqueer Alam Counsel for Respondent :- Rishabh Kapoor Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Krishna Vishwakarama, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to pay the petitioner, a widow of Late Sri Raghuwar Singh who was working under the respondents, amount of leave encashment along with interest. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Krishna Vishwakarama, Advocate holding brief of Sri Rishabh Kapoor, learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Pachhere/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench