VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tarnnum Bano Alias Tarrannum Bano and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
23 November 2023
Bench
Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
Case no.
8953/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8953 of 2023 Petitioner :- Tarnnum Bano Alias Tarrannum Bano And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA who appears on behalf of the State-respondents.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioners has pointed out that as per the High School mark sheet of the petitioner no. 1, she was born on 9.4.1990 and is major.

¶3It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that both the petitioners are major and have married with each other out of their own free will but the opposite party nos. 4 and 5 being the brothers of petitioner no. 1 is harassing the petitioners mentally and physically with the collusion of local police and threatening them to arrest the petitioners in a very illegal and arbitrary manner, hence, this petition has been filed praying the following main reliefs: "I) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties particularly opposite party no. 2 and 3 to protect life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members and also direct not to harass, threaten and interfere in peaceful matrimonial life of the petitioners in any manner and also direct the Opposite Party No. 2 to give the protection to the petitioners

and

their

family

members. II) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding opposite parties particularly opposite party no. 2 and 3 to not to take any action against the petitioners and their family members on the basis of false complainant of the Opposite Party No.4 & 5."

¶4This Court is of the opinion that in case, the opposite party nos. 4 and 5 threatens the petitioners, they have remedy under Sections 154, 156 and 200 of Cr.P.C. to approach the authority concerned.

¶5In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 23.11.2023 AKK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.