Mirza Uman Beig v. Union of India Thru. Foreign Secy. Minsirty External Affairs Govt. of India , New Delhi and Others

Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10269 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mirza Uman Beig Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Foreign Secy. Minsirty External Affairs Govt. Of India , New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Mishra,Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Sri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Advocate and Deputy Solicitor General of India assisted by Sri Varun Pandey, appearing for respondent no.5.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the application for issuance of passport has not been dealt with by the competent authority since 19.09.2022.

¶3The petitioner in his writ petition has clearly disclosed in paragraph no.8 that an F.I.R. No.0488, under Sections 147,323,504,506 I.P.C.was lodged by the complainant against the petitioner and some other persons at Police Station Gosaiganj, District Sultanpur. The said criminal case is pending before the competent Court concerned.

¶4The Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs has issued guidelines, according to which in a situation where criminal cases are pending against a person, on applying for issuing a passport/renewal of passport, the matter is regulated under Notification dated 25th August, 1993, which, for ready reference, has been reproduced in a judgment rendered by this Court in Misc. Bench No.31723 of 2018. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed reliance on a judgment rendered by Delhi High Court in Criminal Appeal No.686/2018 (Ashok Khanna Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation) decided on

07.11.2019, MANU/DE/3767/2019 and reliance has also been placed upon a judgment/order passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 1342/2017 (Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation), MANU/SCOR/34388/2021, decided on 27.09.2021.

¶5On a careful reading of the notification, it is gathered that it is the competent court where the criminal case is pending that the petitioner may make an appropriate application for issuance/renewal of the passport before the court concerned seeking directions to the competent authority for issuing/renewal of passport during pendency of the criminal cases.

¶6In case any such application is filed, it is expected that the competent court shall pass necessary orders expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of its filing, after putting the parties to notice.

¶7With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Arjun/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench