- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 23 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 10196/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 10196 of 2023 Petitioner :- Randheer Kumar Rastogi And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin.Secy. Finance U.P. Govt. Civil Secrt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Jyoti Prakash,Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rudra Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Rudra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.2.
¶2Learned counsel for respondent no.2, on instructions, states that though the amount due against the petitioners is more than rupees twenty lacs, but it is an housing loan and in case petitioners deposit an amount of Rs.2,70,000/- with respondent no.2, the account would come out of NPA and thereafter the petitioners may deposit the remaining dues in installments.
¶3In view thereof, petitioners are granted six weeks and no more time for depositing the aforesaid amount of Rs.2,70,000/- with respondent no.2 and in case petitioners deposit the aforesaid amount within a period of six weeks from today, respondent no.2 shall inform the petitioners with regard to the regular installments they are required to pay.
¶4It is made clear that no further application for extension of time shall be entertained in this case.
¶5With the aforesaid, present writ petition stands disposed of. [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.