Santosh Kumar Varma v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Basic Education Lko. and 3 Others

Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9078 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Varma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chandresh Mani Shukla,Saumya Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and Dr. Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4.

¶2With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 and Dr Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 have no objection.

¶4In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent No.4 then the respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation.

¶5With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of.

¶6It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 A. Katiyar High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench