VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dharmendra Singh @ Sonu v. State of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
24 November 2023
Bench
Saurabh Lavaniaauthor
Case no.
11521/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11521 of 2023 Applicant :- Dharmendra Singh @ Sonu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Diwakar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for the following main relief:- "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Court Below not to insist the petitioner to file surety bond in each and every 11 Cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of all the abovementioned 11 Cases, in the interest of justice." Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and he has not committed any offence and he has been implicated in 11 cases. He next submitted that in all the offences which have been registered against the applicants, he has been granted bail. He says that the applicants are not in a position to furnish huge sureties for all the cases in compliance of bail orders. It is further submitted that in regard to cases pending the applicant reliance has been placed paragraph 4 of the application and granted bail in all the cases registered at District Barabanki. Learned counsel for the applicant has relied upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 8914-8915 of 2018; Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P. Learned A.G.A. submits that he does not want to file any counter affidavit. In view of the facts and circumstances as well as rival submissions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of finally in the light law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky (Supra) and the Court below is directed to execute the personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- in every case and produce two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court/Magistrate concerned in one case which shall hold good for rest of the cases. Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Vinay/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.