- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 24 November 2023
- Bench
- Vivek Chaudhary, Manish Kumar
- Case no.
- WRIC 6241/2008
Judgment
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6241 of 2008 Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar and another Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thr.Secy Panchyati Raj And 3 Ors Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudeep Seth,Sridhar Awasthi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for parties.
¶2Petitioner have approached this Court claiming that their Regular Suit no.135 of 2003 was allowed against the State and final decree was passed in their favour on 23.4.2005. Against the said judgment, no appeal was filed by the State nor any recall application was filed.
¶3In Para 15 of the counter affidavit, the State has taken a stand that it will respect the judgment and decree dated 23.4.2005 passed in the aforesaid suit and shall not make any interference in the possession of petitioners in enjoyment of the said property except in accordance with law. The said statement is taken on record.
¶4In view of aforesaid, present writ petition is consigned to record. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 24.11.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.