- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 28 November 2023
- Bench
- Narendra Kumar Johari, Sangeeta Chandra
- Case no.
- 8008/2022
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8008 of 2022 Petitioner :- Harsh Vardhan Khanna Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Purnendu Chakravarty,Pranjal Jain Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Pranshu Agrawal With Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7935 of 2022 Petitioner :- Smt. Uma Khanna And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Purnendu Chakravarty Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J. Hon'ble Narendra Kumar Johari,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State. This Court by its earlier order dated 21.10.2022 had sent the matter for mediation. The Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court has sent the report dated 10.08.2023. This Court has gone through the report dated 10.08.2023 sent by Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The mediation has failed between the parties. This Court has also gone through the contents of the F.I.R. and is of the opinion that the impugned F.I.R. discloses cognizable offence by the petitioners, hence, no interference is called for by this Court in its extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the F.I.R. or for grant of any interim relief to the petitioners and accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed. Interim order, if any, shall stand discharged. Order Date :- 28.11.2023 Rahul High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.