- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 29 November 2023
- Bench
- Shree Prakash Singh
- Case no.
- 5942/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 18 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5942 of 2023 Petitioner :- Angad Pandey And Others Respondent :- Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Udai Pratap Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Rishabh Srivastava Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
¶1Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for petitioners is taken on record.
¶2Heard Shri Udai Pratap Lal, learned counsel for petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for State and Shri Vijay Kumar Yadav, learned Advocate holding brief of Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for Gaon Sabha.
¶3The counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed an appeal bearing no.2399 of 2023 (Angad Pandey Vs. Ram Prakash Pandey) which is pending in the court of respondent no.1. He added that an interim relief application is also pending with the appeal for consideration by the appellate court. He added that the interest of justice will be subserved if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the appellate court to decide the interim relief application pending in the Appeal No.2399 of 2023 under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court.
¶4The counsel appearing for the State and counsel for Gaon Sabha have no objections.
¶5In view of the aforesaid innocuous prayer, the appellate court is directed to consider and decide the interim relief application of the petitioner pending in the Appeal No.2399 of 2023 within a period of 45 days from the date of certified copy of this order is produced before the court concerned.
¶6With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is hereby allowed. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Mohd. Sharif High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.