Phoolmati v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home and Another

Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11623 of 2023 Applicant :- Phoolmati Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Dwivedi,Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/ applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of the Case No.790 of 2022, (State of U.P. vs. Phoolmati), pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Purawa, Unnao arising out of Case Crime No. 134 of 2021, under Section 60(2) Excise Act, Police Station Maurawan, District Unnao and also to quash the summoning order dated 07.06.2022. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in order dated 7.10.2021 passed in Petition for Special Leave to Appeal

(Cri) No.5191 of 2021 Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants. As far as prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant to grant liberty to the applicant to file bail application and the same may be decided in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra), liberty is given to the applicant to move bail application before the trial court and the same shall be decided in view of law laid down in the case of Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another (supra). With the aforesaid observations, the present petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 29.11.2023 Raj High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench